Health: my idea of ??reform? Article 32 of the Constitution - The Daily

Today, after

meteorological disasters that have hit our country in the newspapers all complain that it lacks the “care of the land.” Of course I miss it. But I wonder if there is the care of the person and of his rights. If there is no personal care can exist as the care of the land? Campania is in the limelight because of the land of fires and epidemiologically all primates negative, to the point that it is a neologism coined “ biocide ” the assassination of biological life.

In Campania, the incidence of cancer of all kinds grows to a greater extent than other regions and the Ministry of Health states that the waiting times for chemotherapy are an average of two and a half months. That is the first Campanian tumors to be treated have two and a half months to grow and spread in the bodies of people. In Campania is an emergency because it lacks both the “care of the land” and “personal care”. All are pleased that in our country health spending has declined in recent years of 2.4 per cent (OECD), but if the sick who has paid increasing this reduction? And how it was paid? Today the area so that the person you are in a death grip between a welfare system that is dissolving and morbidity that is increasing.

‘ art. 32 which enshrines the right to health is the most violated article that we just think Ilva, Casale Monferrato, and many other situations not least environmental disasters in Sardinia. Today, Article 32 is under the feet of any public administration. Health is not worth anything because the person is not worth anything anymore. My idea is to share and svecchiarlo Article 32, that is, clean it up from the old visions of natural law nearly a century ago. Health is not only a natural right to defend the famous “physical and psychological integrity”, but it is a complex object that is constructed giving back to the community so common, full ownership over their health and making the social community the first subject of health, acting up at the bottom of subsidiarity. Today, health is no longer just a “public interest” as art. 32, but has become a “general interest”. The economic sustainability of the health system, for example, is a function of health that you build.

expression I like to use is to “reframe” Article 32, that is, to reinterpret it in our time because doing so will not only relive it, but most will increase its operational capabilities. When in this country many years ago started the talk about health, it rested on a strong idea of ??emancipation. In the 70 health could only be the result of the processes of emancipation . Intending emancipation as liberation from the enslavement of the subject, the negative social conditions, exploitation, discrimination, harassment and oppression by. So health in the workplace, but also the health of the woman as the emancipation of women, mental health, the disabled, the elderly, child and so on.

Then we slowly lost ground and from the time when health was not negotiable it will be measured, and we passed the time in which health is negotiated at the beginning and monetizzava up to the health that is no longer even a value in use. That is not worth anything, as it is subject to anything to the limits economic, productive development, competitiveness, speculation, corruption, malfeasance, to the broad understandings.

But

restart Article 32 do not think you can do apart from a new project of emancipation able to liberate man from the old and new subjections. Among the many slavery, the most hateful of all is the disease , I think even before the unemployment, that is, be as innocent victims in Taranto and in Campania and Sardinia of mortality that could be avoided, but it is not for the interest of the economy, the financial crisis, the recession, speculation and corruption When I think of the right to health, (unlike the post-modern philosophers), I do not consider it as an ideal of emancipation has failed and even that is unfinished (as philosophers say neomoderni), I think the law, as I have said in relation to Article 32, must be continually re-contextualized, and almost reinvented, because if we did it would be the ideal of emancipation failed and unfinished. My idea of ??reform is all here.