Health: the "method stamina" becomes a court case, now you ... - Weather Web

Sunday, December 22, 2013, 21:16

” Serious anomalies related to informed consent to the processing of their data in the documentation pending before the Civil Hospital Brescia. ” There are other elements which emerge from the minutes of the technical panel consisting of Nas, Istituto Superiore di Sanita ‘, from the National Transplant Center, AIFA and Universita’ di Modena and Regio Emilia who has read ANSA. In the minutes that have also incorporated the results of the inspection of the Ministry of Health Hospitals in Brescia at the end of May 2012, it is noted that “informed consent and ‘written in a manner inconsistent and confusing.” According to the minutes also there are “serious doubts about the true identity ‘of the infused cells.”
For example, it says,” in fact signed informed consent from patients declares that the cells can be administered ‘white blood cells, usually mixed with other minor components of the blood such as plasma, red blood cells, platelets, or more cells’ which purified mesenchymal cells extracted from bone marrow. ” The committee also describes “a situation of serious risk and fraud” that “set up in the light of the inspections carried out in the Civil Hospital of Brescia in the survey about the Foundation Stamina.” “Based on what has been shown – continues-with laboratory experiments and on the basis of the findings from the survey administration of the Ministry of Health, the technique used by Stamina Foundation and not ‘scienzama belief.” “Doubt” also on the documentation received “by the laboratories of Stamina Foundation on the phenotypic characterizations that may not correspond to the samples analyzed” and the possibility ‘that “the method stamina may not be coincident with the one contained in the patent application of Mr. Vannoni and Molino.
How confused also seems to be the story related to patents. According to the minutes, finally, “and ‘violated a law, that the compassionate use of a drug. The members of the Committee are asking, in fact, “because the medical staff was aware of what ‘was infused” since “it is not nothing in writing” and the only condition is that and’ “second infusion protocol.” Even the photographic documentation relative to the laboratory of Brescia AO “shows – continue the verbal – the inadequacy of the facility for production of cell therapy medicinal products.” “The serious criticality ‘emerged during the two inspections carried out at the laboratory of Brescia AO stem cells prove – to complete the verbal – the cogency of legitimate measure of health issued by AIFA. In the minutes of the technicians, therefore, already ‘showed “the extreme to suggest an action that blocks the use of the method Stamina.”